Innate Spell
-
@halfgiant said in Innate Spell:
How does Innate Spell work in the spell point system?
No one ever asked.
Losing a spell slot means losing a single spell per day with the old casting rules.
Specifically losing a 9th level spell per day to gain a 1st level spell at will.
I am not sure that a permanent reduction of you mana pool by 9 spell points is as much of a cost.
-
you’re basically permanently reducing your manapool to fuel an “at will” ability…
Erok did it with Stoneswimming (which apparently cloud has forgotten over the ybeers), the psionic Adapt Body - Earth, which at the time cost him something like 25 psp’s permanently gone out of his psionic pool -
@dwarf said in Innate Spell:
Erok did it with Stoneswimming (which apparently cloud has forgotten over the ybeers)
I don’t recall it being permanent. I just assumed he was burning PSP all the time.
-
@dwarf said in Innate Spell:
you’re basically permanently reducing your manapool to fuel an “at will” ability…
Right, I’m simply not sure if 9 spell points for a 1st level spell is enough.
-
guess i look at it as - if a mage is willing to permanently burn 1-2 levels worth of his manapool to plink out magic missiles, who am i to argue ? considering that warlocks get a new “at will” invocation every 2 levels too, which tend to be a lot stronger than a 1st lvl spell…
-
@dwarf said in Innate Spell:
guess i look at it as - if a mage is willing to permanently burn 1-2 levels worth of his manapool to plink out magic missiles, who am i to argue ? considering that warlocks get a new “at will” invocation every 2 levels too, which tend to be a lot stronger than a 1st lvl spell…
I’m also assuming that people will not just be dropping magic missile at will.
Epic level feats create spell slots above 9 and thus spells above 1 can be made at will.
I am also fairly certain that there are feats to let metamagic be used on innate abilities.
-
riiiight… but even if you bump it a few notches, its still just the ability to honk off a locked spell effect. whether its a fireball at will (at 12 points, which’d be 3 levels of manapool burned for a standard 18 int wizard) or a Dregnothian Quickened Twinned Acidic Fireball (at twice that for 6 levels of manapool burn for a typical wizbang or a lil’ over 3 levels for the mad one himself @ int24)
i mean, is that REALLY gonna tip the cosmic balance overmuch ??
“Don’t mess with the NEW dregnoth, he’ll melt your face off !!”
… “Versus how he’d just eat me or dissect me, like before… umm, okay.” -
So to complicate matters a smidge.
If i wanted to choose fireball (3rd level spell - 3 spell points)
Add in Arcane Thesis - When casting that spell, you do so at +2 caster level. When you apply any metamagic feats other than Heighten Spell to that spell, the enhanced spell uses up a spell slot one level lower than normal.
A empowered maximized fireball would works as follows:
+1 for empowered, down from +2, and +2 levels for maximized, down from +3 - fireball is a third level spell so we would be using 6 spell points to generate the following -Arcane Thesis + Empowered + Maximized Fireball (now 6-points)
Adding on Innate Spell ( to be a bastard of course ), technically not a metamagic feat so no Arcane thesis reduction, so we have a +8 adder.
Now we have -
Innate Spell + Arcane Thesis + Empowered + Maximized Fireball = 14 spell points permanently removed from your pool, but you can cast that spell at will.So using Kargin as a example a 13th level spell caster + practiced spellcaster(+4) + Arcane Thesis (+2) he is casting a at-will spell 19th level. Which equates to -
19d6 (maximized - 114) * 1.5 = 171 (at-will) in damage.The cost of that is he is now carrying two feats permanently that are specifically for a single at-will spell, and has burned 14 spell points out of his pool permanently.
-
so more thinking…
thins is workable.Innate is +8 levels? Not sober at the moment…
buring 3+8 spell points permanently would let you cast fireball at willl.
I can see this… comments?
-
I don’t see this as being overpowered or unreasonable and to have a at-will power should come at considerable cost. Even in the example i gave, I’m really finding it difficult to come up with a good example that justified a permanent mana pool reduction though.
I think its not the permanent mana pool cost, as much as you have to now carry that feat permanently, consuming that feat slot plus the pool reduction.
Have to ponder some more.
-
IMUHO it would appear, mathemagically, to justify the cost and trouble of innating spells you use EVERY time you play.
something like an innate Big Ohm, for example, would make sense for any of the party’s healers and save them serious spellpoints in the long run (not to mention making them virtual messiahs as they bop from town to town).
stoneswim, for erok, was the obvious choice as he used it almost every session he was toying with the idea of innate kinetic control, energy containment and 2-d weapon when that campaign ended - for the same reason…
innate Fly, on the other hand, makes more sense as a magic item (to dregs) merely because a persistent one isn’t that much drain on his manapool… -
Innate heal is pretty good one, but with the creation of regenable big ohms it looses a bit of its attractiveness. Does the use of a innate spell, make the heal a free action or does it mean a standard action.
-
@halfgiant said in Innate Spell:
spell-like ability.
Per the original post here, it becomes a spell-like ability.
Spell-like abilities are always a standard action.
